Report Abuse

Re: Westgate Change in Policy - Is it Legal?

You would think that any company would do all that's in its power to support the value of its product on the secondary market thereby allowing them to sell the product at a premium, but it seems like Westgate is doing just the opposite. By limiting the benefits of these units bought on the secondary market they diminish the value of ALL their properties. In no way would I even consider a Westgate property now that I see how they treat their customers. What do they think owners should do, keep them forever? This limits the value of their properties that someone bought new from them, not that there is much value used as it is, their actions decrease it even more. And why, so David Siegel can complete the castle he's building?