Report Abuse

What is it that Eishners should still own? It's a deeded timeshare with a surplus of oversold owners. The timeshare owners should own TMC outright plus some. A honest timeshare management company should handle the management for the remaining deeded timeshare owners. Also regarding those who did not pay the exhorbinate maintenance fees because their inability to secure time should not be penalized. The settlement in my understanding is going to compensate according to that criteria. So why should those who did not get use to the already oversold timeshare have to pay for time they did not receive? Reasonable fees for those that did secure time should be paid by those to cover the maintenance fees. Those that were not as fortunate to secure accommodations should not have to pay for that time. Otherwise, in theory we are double paying for the same deed (maintenance and taxes) with no use of the product. A product/time we should be entitle to but unavailable due to the fraud of overselling. Also those that want to sell back due to the excess owners should be compensated at the price they purchased. It's was fraud to oversell the time so why should those victims be penalized for anything less then what they paid? One owner to one deed is what should remain at TMC. Furthermore, doesTMC not have liability insurance that would cover this type of mess? Or errors and omission insurance for the mistake of overselling some 14,000 units. Appears to me whoever made a decision to move TMC in a massive oversell made a very bad error.