Report Abuse

I was referring not to the "pre settlement " fraud which was certainly alleged and proven; hence the settlement. I was referring to fraudulent actions, statements, and/ or lies/misrepresentations made while Eichner was under oath or had been stipulated by him and or his attorney in settlement talks. Meaning, if the terms of the settlement were predicated upon representations by Eicher that later turned out to have been mis truths - the argument being that had the real or true facts come out, the terms of the settlement would have been different. You must have a basis in order to revisit an agreed upon settlement.