Post reply

Re: Deeded vs. Right to use? (by KC):

jayjay has misquoted: >> I respectfully disagree with Ken that the HOA has no involvement in management of the resort. <<

I never said any such thing. What I DID say (and I stand by it and I will happily repeat it once again) is that the management company is the FIRST line of contact and responsibility in this matter and that their name, address and phone number is already known to the complainant. Personally, I'd be on them like a blanket before even bothering with the HOA and their changing members, in scattered multiple locations, available and responsive at their own convenience. That preferred (by me, anyhow) approach has in no way stated or remotely implied in ANY way that, as you badly misquoted me "the HOA has no involvement". That's neither true, nor at all resembling what I said. I'm inclined personally to go right straight after the first line of responsibility --- first and promptly --and that's the management company, plain and simple. To each his / her own approach, certainly, but please don't so grossly and inaccurately misrepresent my words.........

You have every right to disagree with anything I say, but you have NO right whatsoever to inaccurately attribute words to me and then disagree with what I never stated in the first place. I take personal exception and offense to such careless inattention to facts, accuracy and details.