Post reply

Re: Disappointed with RedWeek (by KC):

Re: >> I presume that is where the weeks in question came on line: as deposits in the Redweek exchange program. And our friend above feels that weeks deposited after his were given higher point values by RW than his, even though he has seen those resorts rent for less than his does AND he was an early depositer. << =======================================

Your assumptions may be correct, but I'm not personally inclined to "assume". I was hoping for a more detailed clarification directly from the original poster, since some critical info is missing.

I'm particularly puzzled by the "rent value" reference, without any accompanying indication that s/he is actually comparing the exact same weeks, in units of directly comparable size, at the same resort. If so, there is solid basis for further analysis and discussion. If not, it's just a subjective comparison of apples vs. oranges. As stated already, all weeks simply are not of the same "value" --- even in the very same unit at at the very same resort.

Moreover, are the "rent values" referenced derived just from advertisements (which can and do range from realistic to, shall we say, "very optimistic"), or are they figures KNOWN to have actually been PAID as rent?

C'mon terry314.... step and up and help us to better understand the factual basis of your "disappointment".