Post reply
Original Message:
Re: Against RCI/II Rules to Rent out Exchanges (by Paul R.):
Would seem that prohibiting an owner of a tangible contract, whether it's the original contract or an exchange reservation, from freely selling or exchanging that contract with another party, falls under "restraint of trade" or commerce or something. Would think that the ICC, maybe even the ACLU, might get involved in this case; the ACLU as the "free buying and selling of a purchased property right" ought to be a "civil liberty" or something similar in this country. Furthermore, if an advertisement to sell an exchanged-week reservation is prohibited by RCI, then RCI is denying the printed version of Free Speech.
By discriminating against timeshare owners, and also against RCI "Members", RCI has to be breaking some freedom of something laws in this country. They must be stopped from "having it both ways."