Post reply

Bore No More... (by KC):

jennofera, unconvincing at best, digs the hole even deeper: >> ...I was happy I used them. Everyone's offer is different based on their timeshare. I think maybe you should try using them and see how much happier you will be like I am<< ===============================================

I'm glad that you're "happy", but the indisputable fact remains that it is neither smart nor necessary to ever pay ANYONE a few thousand dollars just to part with a timeshare ownership. I sold six of my former timeshare weeks during the past five years and my collective, total advertising cost for selling ALL SIX of those weeks was less than $100.

for Phill 12: This is NOT an upfront fee "listing" company, per se. They don't "list" --- but they DO collect upfront. PCC's like Time No More Inc, We Collect Timeshares LLC and others (see detailed description of all PCC practices a few posts above) either acquire a power of attorney from the current owner while they attempt to unload the week or, in fewer instances, the PCC actually takes a new deed into their own name and then resells the week. In either case, the timeshare is usually unloaded through a "no reserve" listing on eBay, for any amount they can mange to elicit. The PCC fee for performing the "service" of "taking the timeshare off your hands" is consistently somewhere between $2,000 -- $4,500; the fee must be paid in full, in advance. I've never heard of ANY PCC fee being anywhere outside of that range of cost figures, so it doesn't matter at all that "jennifer" is unwilling to identify her particular figure (or the timeshare) in this fictional tale of "personal experience". I don't actually believe that the "jennifer" postings are real or at all credible anyhow. Personally, I firmly believe that "jennifer" is just a shill seeking to gain some free exposure for Time No More on the Internet.

Keep in mind that many commercial outfits these days (certainly not JUST those involving timeshares, but PARTICULARLY those involving timeshares) use shill postings and other phony Internet "endorsements" just to enable their name to pop up with favorable (even if only fictional) stories generated as "hits" during a Google search conducted on the company name. Unfortunately for such shills, however, there is often also some factual counter-point input challenging the truthfulness and credibility of such fabricated shill endorsements. I hope that I am doing exactly that here right now...