Original Message:
Thanks, Jennie... (by KC):
I too felt that there were a number of substantial factual inaccuracies in Mr. Willett's lengthy discourse above.
I have already filed my own multi page objection with the Court --- and personally, I won't be insulted by even *considering* acceptance of ANY of the worthless little trinkets being offered by RCI. However, I am genuinely fearful that far too many people can't even be bothered to study and fully comprehend just how useless the PROPOSED settlement truly is, and are instead just mindlessly lining up to collect their ONE worthless little trinket from RCI.
I have noticed (and very much appreciate) your efforts on this matter over on TUG and I applaud your tireless efforts. I just hope that, in the end, there will be enough articulate objectors in this matter that Judge Sheridan will ultimately HAVE to take note of the fact that the PROPOSED "settlement" is absolutely nothing but a one-sided FARCE which ultimately benefits ONLY RCI and, if adopted, allows RCI to just return to unacceptable "business as usual" in 24 months anyhow...