Post reply

Re: "Non-transferable" (by KC):

julie1985 wrote:

No; it isn't a "points" resort ownership. I don't know if the "non-transferable" term refers to the fact that I can't take it to a sister resort (non-transferable between resorts), or if I can't give the week to a friend or relative for a present, or I can't rent it to someone... Wondered if others had this same notation on a reservation and what it meant for them!

A week specifically reserved at one resort is NEVER usable at an entirely different resort at that time, so that's certainly not likely to be the intended meaning.

If you have a deeded non-Points "week" ownership at a single location facility, then you certainly have the legal right to use, or gift --- or rent out --- your specifically reserved week at that (non-RCI Points) facility however you may see fit (as long as your fees are paid up to date, of course). In the U.S., that is an inherent ownership right which cannot ever be trumped by ANY resort decree on ANY correspondence. Outside the U.S.A., however, all bets are off (particularly with some Mexican RTU's).

Maybe the resort intended to convey (but just poorly expressed) that no one other than the name reflected on the reservation confirmation will be permitted to check-in WITHOUT a new confirmation being issued in the name of the occupant (if that occupant is to be someone other than the owner who actually reserved the week). Have you called the RESORT directly to ask THEM for an explanation?