Post reply

Re: Manhattan Club Lawsuit (by Chris V.):

ATTENTION MANHATTAN CLUB OWNERS: IN MOST INSTANCES, COURT HEARINGS ARE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC; UNDERSTANDABLY SOME ARE NOT. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING IN OUR COURT SYSTEM AND WE (ESPECIALLY AS DUPED OWNERS OF SHARES OF THE MANHATTAN CLUB) ARE ENTITLED TO HEAR OF DAILY COURT PROCEEDING RESULTS IN SOME WAY OR ANOTHER: DIRECTLY FROM THE NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, ERIC SCHNEIDERMAN, MEDIA/NEWS REPORTAGE OR OTHERWISE. THIS HAS NOT BEEN HAPPENING.

IT'S ESSENTIAL THAT WE ALL.......ALL OF US......EMAIL, SNAIL MAIL, PHONE OR OTHERWISE CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDERMAN, OUR NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL REQUESTING THAT HE KEEP US INFORMED OF THE MANHATTAN CLUB LAWSUIT ON A DAILY (OR AS THE COURT PROCEEDINGS PROGRESS) BASIS. MR. SCHNEIDERMAN HAS A NEWSLETTER THAT IS PUBLISHED REGULARLY, BUT I SAW NOTHING RECENTLY ABOUT OUR LAWSUIT.

SO GET ON YOUR COMPUTER, GET A PEN AND PAPER, OR USE YOUR DIALING FINGER TO CONTACT THE NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO GIVE US THE INFORMATION THAT WE'RE ENTITLED TO. IT'S ESSENTIAL THAT WE DO THIS NOW, AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE AFTER READING THIS!! IN ADDITION WE NEED TO KNOW THE REASON WE OWNERS WERE "SHUT OUT OF FRIDAY'S, SEPT 5 TMC HEARING" IN A PUBLIC COURT. IT SEEMS THAT SINCE WE HAVE OUR NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL ON THE MANHATTAN CLUB LAWSUIT, IT MAY NOT BE NECESSARY TO HAVE A PRIVATE ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT US; HOWEVER, MY KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAW DOESN'T PERMIT LEGAL INTERPRETATION OR THE NEED FOR FURTHER LEGAL REPRESENTATION.

irenes93 wrote:

TMC owners were shut out of Friday's, Sept. 5 TMC hearing. TMC owners are not a party to this action. We are the affected parties, but this case is between the AG's office and The Manhattan Club. We need to become a party to the AG's action against the Manhattan Club so we know about hearings, can review the documentation TMC is submitting, and can put things before the judge the AG's office may not.

We don't know what is going on with this case and we will not know what is going on. The AG'S office has no obligation to tell us anything or do anything we think needs to be done to resolve this case for the benefit of TMC owners. Once we have a lawyer we will not be shut out again.

We need a lawyer sharp enough to swim with TMC's lawyer sharks representing TMC owners. Three things we must do:

1. We need to identify a lawyer to represent us and find out how much it will cost.

2. We need to raise money to pay that lawyer.

3. We need to have a clear set of objectives we want this lawyer to work towards in this case.

Who wants to organize this?