Post reply

Re: Is Getting Rid of Timeshares a Problem? (by NoOneYouKnow):

My sense is that the developer is long gone from most of the resorts where owners want to get rid of their ownership. That is the case with our six weeks, where the developers have not been involved for any of the time we have owned . . . that's 23 years at one of them.

And sure, if an amenable exit strategy is provided, owners should have to pay their fees until they exit.

It is where there is no exit strategy and no assistance from the industry, and owners are being forced to pay for something they don't want by threats and ugliness that something needs to be done.

It's time for HOAs, the governing body in most cases, to get creative. Is forcing inactive owners to pay fees the least expensive, most productive tactic?

Hate begets hate.