Post reply

Re: Class Action Against Diamond Resorts? (by Lance C.):

juliam181 wrote:

Argument reg DRI's oral representation clause.

"Doesn't the oral representation clause let the developer out of the misrepresentation? "

Fraudulent misrepresentation is not protected. That is how the Arizona AG found a case. Again, nothing in the contact is valid if the contract is not valid.

Recommendation to contact attorney.

Let me see if I have this straight. Let's go through the steps:

1) A buyer buys a timeshare at a sales presentation and signs a contract based on what the sales person told the buyer. 2) What was written in the contract is different from what the sales person told the buyer. 3) The buyer signs the contract that clearly states that whatever is in the printed/written contract is binding, even if it is different from what the sales person told the buyer.

So, like so many that were purchased under such conditions, then the buyer has a legitimate case and can sue if he hires the right attorney? And what the sales person told the buyer is binding rather than what the buyer signed? Do I have that correct?