Post reply

Re: Manhattan Club Lawsuit (by L C.):

Kevin/Chris, from the interpretation I'm reading; the 1st pay out is to be divided between owners (in good standing) whom were unable to book their preferred nights and thus lost nights. What perplexes me about this is, it means owners who 'CHOOSE' to loss their nights, instead of those of us who rearranged our lives, accepting some "'OFF"' days instead, are not included??? Secondly, how can then possibly know, who did not get wanted, preferred & even needed nights? Some owners choose not to just throw away unaffordable, paid maintenance fees. For example, I have a grown child in NYC, who's birthday is on a very prime date. I have not been able to get that exact date in years. I usually end up visiting for a few hours on a weekday which is available. NOT EXACTLY BY CHOICE. If I'm reading your initial interpretation correctly, I'd see this as quite discriminatory.

Also has anyone seen or read any indications of payouts IN RATIO TO; half-shares-split/whole-week-shares/2+weeks-ownership & Metropolitan- Suites/Jr.1-bdrm/Executive 1-bdrm/PH, or the many other combos of ownership, as we all paid different MF's. ???