Post reply
Original Message:
No "endorsement", no "advertising" --- just accurate facts... (by KC):
For the record, I do not and will not "advertise" for Michael Finn. I have merely noted that I have met him and spoken with him face to face on several different occasions and I respect him (which is something I cannot say about many attorneys I've encountered over the years --- and something I cannot say about ANY upfront fee "exit / relief / escape / rescue" parasite operation). Period.
That clearly said, I must correct an inaccuracy that both lancec13 and donp have erroneously stated. In short, there are not always "third party" lenders in developer timeshare purchases. When there is no third party lender involved, negotiation of contract and loan termination (it's not a "mortgage"; it's an unsecured loan, often at a high interest rate) is in fact sometimes possible, even if or when there is an unpaid loan balance. To cite just one specific example (out of numerous available others) Wyndham timeshare financing is entirely "in house", with no third party lender involvement of any kind. I could cite a few other examples, but I've already made my intended point that no "one size fits all" proclamation or statement ever accurately "fits" all situations.
Fwiw, Finn is involved in litigation with several timeshare developers, but rather than be falsely accused of "advertising for" or "endorsing" him, I will say nothing further in these forums regarding Finn Law Group or Michael Finn. I chimed in on this subject at all ONLY because people specifically asked about this law firm and I have seen very little input in these forums from anyone else who actually has any first hand, face to face experience or encounters with Finn --- as I have. Enough said.