adahiscout wrote:In fairness, Ken, shouldn't we consider the value we receive from the use of our timeshares in addition to the income from selling them? Together, they may well equal the purchase price. (Just as we have the value of using our car plus its resale value--which very rarely equals what we paid, new OR used.)
You will probably respond that folks should buy a good "used" timeshare (As we did buy good used cars for many years!) but if NOBODY buys from the dealer, the whole industry eventually folds.
The salesman is worthy of his hire. In the case of timeshares, he is not only selling a "product" he is selling a concept and educating a prospect in a whole new field. If he and the developers did not do this, there would be no interest in buying resales either. Getting a resort's name out there, providing incentives for prospects to take a look, financing construction before the "product" is sold---these all take money and are legitimate expenses.
Should we need additional points in one of the companies we have, we would consider Resales in the future, but I am not totally sorry or ashamed to have bought from the developers. They dun good! Just don't buy a house, a car, a dog, or a timeshare that you really can't afford.
The problem is that too many timeshare salespeople are dishonest. They do not properly present the product they are selling. They lead people to believe that if they purchase a particular week , they will be readily able to exchange it for any place pictured in the RCI or I.I. "dream book." They misrepresent the true likely trading power of the week. They use a lot of "smoke and mirrors" to convince the customer that they are purchaseing something far more valuable than it actually is. I hardly consider that "educating" the customer. It's more like fleecing him.
When a salesperson determines that the customer is niave and has no experience or knowledge base about timeshares, they pounce on them like vultures, attempting to sell them the least valuable off-season week at an exorbitant price.
The highly rated Royal Resorts in Cancun (Royal Mayan, Royal Islander, Royal Sands, Riyal Caribbean, and Club Internacional de Cancun aka "VCI") conduct low pressure honest, factual presentations. The prices are in writing and are non-negotiable. Prospects are encouraged to take the information home with them, discuss it with family, friends, and/or trusted professionals e.g. accountant, attorrney, or financial advisor and get in touch with the salesperson if and when they are ready to buy.
Other resorts should be compelled to adopt that type of strategy as well. About 50% of the price people pay for timeshares purchased from the developer goes toward marketing expenses, especially the commissions of the sales staff. Eliminate the high pressure sales pitch and charge the proper price, and people will not start out feeling that they have been cheated, lied to, and taken advantage of.
Developers should be building in desirable areas, not just just throwing up something in an area they know will be of limited value. Resorts in areas where there are low demand months should close down during those months and save the money spent on staffing and utilities. These worthless weeks should not be sold at all. But the greedy developers want to sell as much as possible, then move on after reaping exorbitant profits.
When a person is buying a new car, he has usually spent a lot of time researching his options, and is aware of the "going price." If he decides to buy a used car, he knows he is getting a vehicle which will have considerably less "life" left than a new one. With timeshares, there is virtually no difference between the qaulity of the unit in which he will be vacationing or exchanging, no matter what price he paid.
In case you think I am bitter about having bought a timeshare at too high a price, you're wrong. All of the weeks we own (currently 15) were bought resale at bargain prices after doing a lot of homework.