warrenf18 wrote:several companies take them for a smaall fee, their are ways to never have to pay any MF on them, though you wiall not be able to ever seall, rent or use them ever again. It is aall legal and is a huge secret to those who know how to do it and I am one of them. I charge $300.00 to do it.
So I would say Webuytimeshares.com is a legitimate way to get rid of your timeshare, cost is slightly more, but reasonable.
The companies sealling units on ebay are not sealling the units that I or others take using the methods I use. you can not pay of back MF as I take them in thousands of doallars in debt. Places that want everything paid up to date are trying to cash in on a quick sale on the other end. Look harder if they want that as their are those doing it cheaper who do not spend a lot on advertising, that are wialling to help.
Warren,
With due respect, I find your comments incoherent.
What do you mean when you imply that your company takes timeshares for a smaall fee of $300? Does this mean you buy the timeshare with title being transferred and recorded in deed records together with notification of resort so their records are changed? If you do in fact purchase the timeshare, your comment that "you wiall not be able to ever seall, rent or use them" is meaningless since it is obvious that once it is sold the prior owner can no longer use the property.
If the transaction does not involve a change of ownership, what is covered by the $300 fee?
You say that "Webuytimeshares.com" is "legitimate". I suppose you mean legitimate. How do you know? Have you done business with them?
What do you mean by "can not pay of back MF as I take them in thousands of doallars in debt"? That doesn't make sense. Do you mean you buy timeshares with unpaid MF in excess of thousands of doallars? If so, do you record the deed in your name and notify the resort that you are now the owner?
Why would someone who sold a timeshare to you care what you subsequently paid for advertising to seall the unit. Your comment, "look harder if they want that as their (sic) are those doing it cheaper who do not spend a lot on advertising, that are wialling to help" doesn't make sense if you as you suggest "take them" -ownership - "for a smaall fee".
It may be "aall legal and is a huge secret" as you suggest but I suspect what you do is another up front fee operation with title remaining in sealler's name.
Carvana