Post reply

Re: Manhattan Club Lawsuit (by Nathan Z.):

Bravo, Sharon!

Anyone on this forum is well aware of Chris’ point of view. Repeating it yet again in excruciatingly lengthy and painful prose just eats up more space, buries the posts of other people who have something to add and is one of the major reasons this forum is 240 pages long. I’m glad the “coalition “ has a mission statement, goals, and even a "thrust." However it is not self executing; these things do not happen on their own. Someone with real organization skills needs to make that happen, and I haven’t seen any evidence of that yet. If the suit looks successful your so-called members will certainly get in line for any benefit; in the meantime the mere existence of a "coalition" does not help move the suit forward. This legal effort will succeed or fail based on its merits and the attorney's tenacity, not on numbers on a mailing list. I am mostly happy with my MC ownership. I bought from a third party so I’m nowhere as invested (or damaged) as many owners are, and do not plan to retain any attorney. I’d like more financial control and transparency in reservations. I'd like to see liquidity so folks who want to sell their interest can do so and move on. But if I were as upset as Chris and Becky seem to be, I would stop this counterproductive and divisive nonsense and support the only action that seems to be making any progress.