Post reply
Original Message:
Re: Manhattan Club Lawsuit (by Nathan Z.):
Gail,
No doubt Chris has been a great part of the forum, certainly as measured by volume. And he gives lots of advice. I leave it to anyone who has taken it to say how good it is. What is consistent is that he keeps talking about "retribution" and uses lots of legal sounding phrases and accusations of "proven" crimes - even though this is a civil matter and he's no lawyer. He spent weeks vacillating on whether or not to retain Zimmerman and complaining about not receiving answers or responses to his questions before he retained him. Now he is the "co-founder" of the grandiosely named "coalition" which muddies the waters further. It has goals but no means to accomplish them, does not help the existing effort, but provides the illusion of action for those on the sidelines. I believe there is a strategic reason Zimmerman has not disclosed how many clients have retained his firm; most likely he has also advised his clients not to make public statements. So what might your objectives be?